🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.